- From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:50:48 +0200
An implementation that exports the property ?sandwich? as the attribute ?sm?rg?sbord? is nuts and should not be cared about as such. Chris -----Original Message----- From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org [mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 11:23 AM To: Kristof Zelechovski; 'Simon Pieters'; 'Thomas Broyer'; whatwg at whatwg.org Subject: Re: [whatwg] Allowed characters in attribute names On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:18:28 +0200, Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj at stegny.2a.pl> wrote: > Why should I want to use a localized attribute name for the embed > element? I assume that the attribute named ?sm?rgasbord? should > necessarily > correspond to an internal property of the same name. This would require > a localized compiler to compile the embedded object in the first place > because mixing natural languages like ?switch(sm?rgasbord)? in source > code looks bad and makes the code chaotic and unreadable. You should not assume. These are exposed as key / value pairs depending on the particular plugin implementation. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 04:50:48 UTC