- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 12:41:03 +0300
On Jun 1, 2007, at 09:34, Ian Hickson wrote: >>> I don't know which section this is talking about. >> >> It was about <datagrid>. >> >>> Is it better now? >> >> I think the non-normative intro section still doesn't sufficiently >> cover >> the relationship to the DOM and the CSS frame tree. > > The relationship to CSS will all be in the rendering section. > > I guess I don't really know what you think is needed in the intro > section, > I'm probably too close to it. Could you write some questions that you > think an intro section should answer? * When the data source was initialized from the DOM, will changes to the datagrid be reflected back to the DOM? * Is the datagrid a replaced element for the purposes of CSS or tree of anonymous/generated boxes? * What parts (if any) are expected to map to native widgets in Cocoa/Win32/GTK+? * Is datagrid useful for any purpose without scripting? If yes, please give an example. * What is datagrid expected to look like in visual UAs? * Is datagrid rendering expected to have pixel-consistent metrics across visual UAs? Answers to these would help a lot in setting up expectations against which the normative part could be understood. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen at iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2007 02:41:03 UTC