- From: Sander <html5@zoid.nl>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 20:51:25 +0200
Stijn Peeters schreef: > Sander schreef: >> K?i?tof ?elechovski schreef: >>> >>> The acronym URL expands to "Uniform Resource **Locator**?. The >>> string ?print:#? does not match this spec: it is not a locator, it >>> is a processing instruction. BTW, the full form of the local URL ?#? >>> can be viewed as ?html:#? (whether it is allowed by the URL standard >>> or not) which means that you need a URL to access the resource you >>> want to print; prefixing it with ?print:? would result in a double >>> URL scheme, which is unacceptable. Therefore it is better to use a >>> special target, if any. >>> >> Would href="print://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/" have >> been better then? > I think new URI schemes are outside the scope of the WHATWG work. See > also http://rfc.net/std0066.html#s3.1. and http://rfc.net/rfc2718.html My initial request was not about a specific technique, but about a functionality. If a pseudo-protocol is not an option, maybe there's another solution. cheers, Sander
Received on Saturday, 28 July 2007 11:51:25 UTC