- From: Stijn Peeters <stijn.p@hccnet.nl>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 20:07:22 +0200
Sander schreef: > K?i?tof ?elechovski schreef: >> >> The acronym URL expands to "Uniform Resource **Locator**?. The string >> ?print:#? does not match this spec: it is not a locator, it is a >> processing instruction. BTW, the full form of the local URL ?#? can >> be viewed as ?html:#? (whether it is allowed by the URL standard or >> not) which means that you need a URL to access the resource you want >> to print; prefixing it with ?print:? would result in a double URL >> scheme, which is unacceptable. Therefore it is better to use a >> special target, if any. >> > Would href="print://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/" have > been better then? I think new URI schemes are outside the scope of the WHATWG work. See also http://rfc.net/std0066.html#s3.1. and http://rfc.net/rfc2718.html Regards, Stijn
Received on Saturday, 28 July 2007 11:07:22 UTC