- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:44:36 +0100
* Henri Sivonen wrote: >The introduction of <em> and <strong> (circa 1993) has failed to >achieve a semantic improvement over <i> and <b>, because prominent >tools such as Dreamweaver, Tidy, IE and Opera as well as simplified >well-intentioned advocacy treat <em> and <strong> merely as more >fashionable alternatives to <i> and <b>. For Tidy this isn't true at all. The only way in which Tidy treats <i> and <b> specially is that there is a configuration option to turn them into --logical-emphasis. It defaults to off and is meant to aid people trying to recover from poor choices e.g. a graphical editor might have made. -- Bj?rn H?hrmann ? mailto:bjoern at hoehrmann.de ? http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 ? Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 ? http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim ? PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 ? http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 11 January 2007 14:44:36 UTC