[whatwg] contenteditable, <em> and <strong>

Le 10 janv. 2007 ? 22:01, Henri Sivonen a ?crit :
>> (in Japanese) a switch to katakana,
>
> Wouldn't a normal Japanese writer enter the text as katakana into  
> the document content instead of requesting the UA to transform  
> hiragana or even kanji to katakana?

katakana is used to represent foreign words. They do not necessary  
have a kanji, expressing the similar concept in japanese.
hiragana is a phonetic system to pronounce the kanjis.

These 3 systems are not equivalent.


-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Received on Wednesday, 10 January 2007 22:57:47 UTC