W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2007

[whatwg] Presentational safety valves

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:07:11 +0100
Message-ID: <op.tlmgx9ti64w2qv@id-c0020>
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:04:14 +0100, Karl Dubost <karl at w3.org> wrote:
> Le 4 janv. 2007 ? 10:12, Ian Hickson a ?crit :
>> I don't personally know enough about <ruby> to spec it. I would  
>> certainly
>> look at detailed <ruby> spec proposals (semantics, parsing, DOM) if they
>> were comprehensive, and if they seemed sane, include them.
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/ruby/
> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-ruby/
>
> Intro article
> http://www.w3.org/QA/2006/02/ruby_annotation_to_change_the
>
> Implementations? see the bottom of the intro article.

Those don't cover parsing or the DOM (not sure what should be said there  
specifically though). Semantics aren't really well covered either.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2007 01:07:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:31 UTC