- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:33:30 +0000
Matthew Raymond wrote: > I've been pondering a use for the <m> element, and I agree that the > highlighting sematics make the name "hi" a better choice. Also, I think > it would be most useful in this context: > > | <blockquote> > | XForms is a W3C recommendation. > | <hi by="Matthew Raymond" title="This comment has no logical basis."> > | XForms Tiny is does not conflict with XForms, but WF2 does.</hi> > | </blockquote> Whatever the merits of <hi> over <ins>, putting complex notes intended for human consumption into attributes like "title" that cannot contain hypermedia references or semantic or linguistic information seems guaranteed to break. -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Sunday, 18 February 2007 08:33:30 UTC