- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 10:46:12 +0100
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 00:05:03 +0100, Matthew Raymond <mattraymond at earthlink.net> wrote: > I've been pondering a use for the <m> element, and I agree that the > highlighting sematics make the name "hi" a better choice. Also, I think > it would be most useful in this context: FWIW, I think <hi> is a very confusing name. I keep thinking of some header until I read it's supposed to replace the <m> element. If this element is needed <m> is definitely a better name. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 18 February 2007 01:46:12 UTC