- From: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:44:28 +0100
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:21:27 -0500, Michel Fortin wrote: > Le 2007-02-13 ? 8:07, David Latapie a ?crit : > >> This is my belief there is a need for properly ?binding? (is that the >> right term) a picture and description. I'd go further by saying we need >> the rethink the ?master-slave?/?content-description? relationship in >> X/HTML >> >> table+caption >> image+description (not speaking of "alt" here) >> dt+dd >> list+introduction to the list (LH) > > <table>+<caption> works fine already. > > Image+description should be covered by <figure>, although its current > restrictions are pretty limitative in my opinion. > > <dt>+<dd> works fine too, I think. It may be used as a substitute for > <figure> currently, but I think the appearance of <figure> in the > spec will make this practice obsolete. > > As for lists, maybe <legend> should be allowed within list elements, > although I can't say I have seen as much interest for this as for > captioning images. > > So I wonder what is to rethink exactly, because beside some minor > issues it seems to be evolving in the right direction. What I meant is that these values shall be merged. For now, it seems like ?double standards, two sets of rules? : we have several key-value here, but all have their own tag. Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems there is room for reduction here. -- </david_latapie> U+0F00 http://blog.empyree.org/en (English) http://blog.empyree.org/fr (Fran?ais) http://blog.empyree.org/sl (Slovensko)
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 06:44:28 UTC