- From: Michel Fortin <michel.fortin@michelf.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:21:27 -0500
Le 2007-02-13 ? 8:07, David Latapie a ?crit : > This is my belief there is a need for properly ?binding? (is that the > right term) a picture and description. I'd go further by saying we > need > the rethink the ?master-slave?/?content-description? relationship in > X/HTML > > table+caption > image+description (not speaking of "alt" here) > dt+dd > list+introduction to the list (LH) <table>+<caption> works fine already. Image+description should be covered by <figure>, although its current restrictions are pretty limitative in my opinion. <dt>+<dd> works fine too, I think. It may be used as a substitute for <figure> currently, but I think the appearance of <figure> in the spec will make this practice obsolete. As for lists, maybe <legend> should be allowed within list elements, although I can't say I have seen as much interest for this as for captioning images. So I wonder what is to rethink exactly, because beside some minor issues it seems to be evolving in the right direction. Michel Fortin michel.fortin at michelf.com http://www.michelf.com/
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 06:21:27 UTC