W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2007

[whatwg] +/- in SGML DOCTYPE

From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:19:32 +0100
Message-ID: <r237Ps-1051p-8843BFE469654A21A14C9D8A6ABBD060@pounder.neutri.no>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

giecrilj at stegny.2a.pl wrote:

>[83.1] N/A because W3C is not an IDN.

No, but ???w3.org??? is; and the point was to illustrate that 
whether the Owner Identifier used is registered or unregistered 
has nothing to do with whether the source is an officially 
recognized standards organization or not. Anyone who controls an 
Internet Domain Name get to issue Formal Public Identifiers with 
a ???+??? in them.

Granted the IDN option was added to SGML only as of the WebSGML 
Adaptations Annex, but that's simply because the web made ISO's 
typical practice of acting as a registry for namespace hierarchy 
(cf. SNMP OIDs etc.) un-scaleable for the use the web put FPIs to.

- -- 
???See... *That* is the problem... Scotch is for sipping, 
relaxing, and deep
  thoughts... Jack is what you drink when you need to work 
through the pain.???
                                                             -- 
John C. Welch

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP SDK 3.9

wj8DBQFHZj8io/I+siR19ewRAkB2AKD7HyT0+YHqX9478CVTA1piSHSdAACfeMKZ
uJIx4Y2jElJMkGjprOC0+XY?pc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 17 December 2007 01:19:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:59 UTC