- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:19:32 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
giecrilj at stegny.2a.pl wrote:
>[83.1] N/A because W3C is not an IDN.
No, but ???w3.org??? is; and the point was to illustrate that
whether the Owner Identifier used is registered or unregistered
has nothing to do with whether the source is an officially
recognized standards organization or not. Anyone who controls an
Internet Domain Name get to issue Formal Public Identifiers with
a ???+??? in them.
Granted the IDN option was added to SGML only as of the WebSGML
Adaptations Annex, but that's simply because the web made ISO's
typical practice of acting as a registry for namespace hierarchy
(cf. SNMP OIDs etc.) un-scaleable for the use the web put FPIs to.
- --
???See... *That* is the problem... Scotch is for sipping,
relaxing, and deep
thoughts... Jack is what you drink when you need to work
through the pain.???
--
John C. Welch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP SDK 3.9
wj8DBQFHZj8io/I+siR19ewRAkB2AKD7HyT0+YHqX9478CVTA1piSHSdAACfeMKZ
uJIx4Y2jElJMkGjprOC0+XY?pc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 17 December 2007 01:19:32 UTC