- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:59:05 -0700
On Aug 12, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Krzysztof ?elechowski wrote: > Dnia sobota, 11 sierpnia 2007 22:14, Maciej Stachowiak napisa?: >> On Aug 11, 2007, at 10:00 AM, K?i?tof ?elechovski wrote: >>> Originally the name after the hash was a bookmark, not a fragment, >>> because >>> it would be defined on an anchor. I agree that until the new >>> semantic makes >>> it to the common knowledge using the name "fragment" for the purpose >>> may be >>> surprising for some developers. >> >> When was it called a bookmark? I'm pretty sure it has been called a >> fragment identifier back to at least the late '90s. > > In the early '90s? And I did not say it was called a bookmark but > it was like > a bookmark semantically. Apparently it's been called a fragment identifier for about as long as the World Wide Web has existed. I don't know what you mean by "like a bookmark semantically". It's no more or less like a bookmark than any other part of a URI. Regards, Maciej
Received on Sunday, 12 August 2007 14:59:05 UTC