W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2007

[whatwg] hashchange only dispatched in history traversal

From: Krzysztof Żelechowski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:38:34 +0200
Message-ID: <200708121938.35124.giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
Dnia sobota, 11 sierpnia 2007 22:14, Maciej Stachowiak napisa?:
> On Aug 11, 2007, at 10:00 AM, K?i?tof ?elechovski wrote:
> > Originally the name after the hash was a bookmark, not a fragment,
> > because
> > it would be defined on an anchor.  I agree that until the new
> > semantic makes
> > it to the common knowledge using the name "fragment" for the purpose
> > may be
> > surprising for some developers.
>
> When was it called a bookmark? I'm pretty sure it has been called a
> fragment identifier back to at least the late '90s.

In the early '90s?  And I did not say it was called a bookmark but it was like 
a bookmark semantically.
Chris
Received on Sunday, 12 August 2007 10:38:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:36 UTC