W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2007

[whatwg] hashchange only dispatched in history traversal

From: Křištof Želechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:00:37 +0200
Message-ID: <002701c7dc39$321286b0$4d01010a@IBM42F76C011DF>
Originally the name after the hash was a bookmark, not a fragment, because
it would be defined on an anchor.  I agree that until the new semantic makes
it to the common knowledge using the name "fragment" for the purpose may be
surprising for some developers.

Best regards
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org
[mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Ian Hickson
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 12:15 AM
To: Maciej Stachowiak
Cc: WHATWG
Subject: Re: [whatwg] hashchange only dispatched in history traversal


I kind of like onfragmentload but "fragment" seems to have connotations of 
bits of documents rather than of fragment identifiers. I don't think it's 
necessarily any clearer than "hash"... I don't know.
Received on Saturday, 11 August 2007 10:00:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:36 UTC