W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2007

[whatwg] Where did the "rev" attribute go?

From: Křištof Želechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 19:33:29 +0200
Message-ID: <000a01c7daab$72ced990$4d01010a@IBM42F76C011DF>
I assume that you have too much current work to remember what you have
written and why.  You suggested that using class names as semantic
attributes requires some central authority to publish a specification of the
microformat in order that the robots are able to find out the meaning of the
class names used.  I disagreed because I think the meaning can be inferred
from the names themselves.
And no, this is not a request for a change.

Cheers,
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org
[mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Ian Hickson
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 1:23 AM
To: K?i?tof ?elechovski
Cc: 'WHAT Working Group Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Where did the "rev" attribute go?

On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, K?i?tof ?elechovski wrote:
>
> Automatic: class=A-N means A N.  No spec needed.
> E.g.: class=red-herring means a red herring, and class=important-news
means
> some important news.

I don't understand this post; please let me know if it was requesting a 
change to the spec (ideally by explaining what is wrong with the spec 
that needs changing).

Cheers,
-- 
Ian Hickson               
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2007 10:33:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:36 UTC