- From: Jon Barnett <jonbarnett@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:48:18 +0000
On 4/22/07, Kornel Lesinski <kornel at osiolki.net> wrote: > On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:26:55 +0100, Jon Barnett <jonbarnett at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > By "entirely omitted alt", do you still only mean WYSIWYG editors? If > > not, I agree. The distinction would be as follows: > > (1) <img src="obvious.jpg" alt="obvious"> - This image represents text, > > particularly the word "obvious". Lynx should replace it with the word > > "obvious" and do nothing else. > > (2) <img src="gallery2.jpg"> The image is part of the content and > > doesn't represent text. Lynx should indicate that the image is missing > > and offer a way to download it > > I'm a bit worried about this one - authors too often forget (or don't > care) to add alt attribute, and this case gives it a different meaning. > > I think that for (2) there should be either magic alt value or some way of > specyfing that alt was intentionally omitted, and not forgotten (special > classname? presence of title attribute?). > > -- > regards, Kornel Lesi?ski > The "rel" attribute isn't specified for the img element, but this might be a good use for it - what relationship does this image have with the document. Thoughts on that, or something new? If the alt attribute is required, what should it be for (2)? Blank? A paragraph describing the vista of the Grand Canyon?
Received on Sunday, 22 April 2007 10:48:18 UTC