- From: Kornel Lesinski <kornel@osiolki.net>
- Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:48:40 +0100
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:26:55 +0100, Jon Barnett <jonbarnett at gmail.com> wrote: > By "entirely omitted alt", do you still only mean WYSIWYG editors? If > not, I agree. The distinction would be as follows: > (1) <img src="obvious.jpg" alt="obvious"> - This image represents text, > particularly the word "obvious". Lynx should replace it with the word > "obvious" and do nothing else. > (2) <img src="gallery2.jpg"> The image is part of the content and > doesn't represent text. Lynx should indicate that the image is missing > and offer a way to download it I'm a bit worried about this one - authors too often forget (or don't care) to add alt attribute, and this case gives it a different meaning. I think that for (2) there should be either magic alt value or some way of specyfing that alt was intentionally omitted, and not forgotten (special classname? presence of title attribute?). -- regards, Kornel Lesi?ski
Received on Sunday, 22 April 2007 02:48:40 UTC