- From: Michael <mikes@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 13:06:30 +0900
Alexey Feldgendler <alexey at feldgendler.ru>, 2006-10-31 20:54 +0600: > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:43:37 +0600, Michel Fortin <michel.fortin at michelf.com> wrote: > > > Personally, I'd favor <term> and <time> instead, or anything else > > that conveys a meaning. That's especially important since these > > element will have, most of the time, no noticeable effect on the > > visual representation of the document. > > For <x>, I'd prefer <xref> rather than <term>. But, for me, <x> is just fine. Given that <xref> as used in other vocabularies is a general cross-reference element that's optionally empty (if empty the text of the cross-reference is generated from the title of element it references), and given that the Web Apps 1.0 <x> isn't a general cross-reference element but instead non-empty "a cross-reference to an instance of the use of a term, such as a taxonomic designation, technical term, an idiomatic phrase from another language, or similar", <term> seems more appropriate than <xref> --Mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 2245 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20061101/b1400e7a/attachment.bin>
Received on Tuesday, 31 October 2006 20:06:30 UTC