- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:00:47 +1100
Matthew Raymond wrote: > Here's a thought: > > | <p> > | <grouplabel for="gender">Gender:</grouplabel> > | <label><input type="radio" name="gender" value="m">Male</label> > | <label><input type="radio" name="gender" value="f">Female</label> > | </p> > > The element <grouplabel> gives the label for the group. That's similar to the <label group=""> idea I posted. > The |for| attribute in this case takes a name rather than and ID, I think that could be somewhat confusing using the same attribute name for different, but somewhat related, features. That's why I like the group attribute, because then there's no chance for confusion about whether it takes a name or id in this context. Also, <label> already supported, so there's fewer backwards compatibility issues. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/
Received on Tuesday, 31 October 2006 19:00:47 UTC