W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2006

[whatwg] HTML syntax: </thead>, </tbody> and </tfoot> omission

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:44:43 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0611302237310.30491@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Simon Pieters wrote:
> The syntax section says:
>   A thead element's end tag may be omitted if the thead
>   element is immediately followed by a tbody or tr element.
> Tables created by the HTML parser in conforming HTML5 will always have a 
> tbody element.

Oops, that should have been tbody and tfoot. Good catch.

> Further, the <tbody> start tag is also optional if it 
> starts with <tr>. [...]

Good catch as well.

> I think this is better fixed by talking about start tags instead of 
> elements (except for parent elements).

It gets very confusing if you talk about tags being followed by elements. 
The "tags" are just unstructured characters in a stream. The "elements" 
are in a DOM. So the presence or absence of tags IMHO has to be given in 
terms of the elements in the DOM.

But at any rate, fixed, by saying that <tbody> can't be omitted if the 
preceeding element's end tag was omitted.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 30 November 2006 14:44:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:50 UTC