- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:42:14 -0500
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Sam Ruby wrote: >> Is there really any excuse for allowing "<b><i>OMG!</b></i>"? No, but >> HTML5 is willing to pinch its nose with thumb and forefinger and look >> the other way. > > I'll reply to the rest of the thread later (I'm personally still unsure > about the proposal, and I'm eagerly reading each mail on the thread to > see what points people are making), but I just wanted to jump in here and > clarify that "<b><i>OMG!</b></i>" has exactly the same status in the spec > right now as "<img/>" does. So if what we do for "<b><i>OMG!</b></i>" is > acceptable, then I don't really understand what the proposal is. Quite likely I read the part of the spec dealing with the "list of active formating elements" too quickly. My mistake. - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2006 08:42:14 UTC