- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 16:26:22 +0200
On Nov 9, 2006, at 16:07, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > Since (a & b) is equivalent to (a, b)|(b, a), aren't both of those > equivalent as well? That's one of the limitations of DTDs. :-) In RELAX NG & means a real interleave, so the above equivalence holds if a and b are terminals but doesn't hold if a and b are non- terminals that expand with + or *. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen at iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Thursday, 9 November 2006 06:26:22 UTC