W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2006

[whatwg] Test suite: Embedded content

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 01:05:30 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0611080103410.30375@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Christian Biesinger wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, what's a plugin and what isn't is a UA thing, so if the UA 
> > decides that its PNG and SVG "plugins" happen to be native support, 
> > well, that's what it is. (Both PNG and SVG are recognised by Mozilla's 
> > <embed> because at one point they were plugin-only in IE and so people 
> > would use <embed> instead of <img>/<object> and so when Mozilla moved 
> > to native implemen- tations for those types, it kept <embed> working 
> > for compatiblility.)
> BTW, Mozilla supports all its image formats in <embed>.

That's allowed, it just means the "plugin" is the browser itself.

> How can you drop <applet> if you want to be compatible with the current 
> web?

Much the same way we can drop <center>: even though it's not valid in 
HTML5, it doesn't mean browsers won't support it. It's possible that it 
will be mentioned in the Rendering section (which I don't plan to write 
until the end of the process).

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2006 17:05:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:49 UTC