- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 00:59:38 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Oct 23, 2006, at 21:31, Ian Hickson wrote: > > > I think cells extending (via colspan/rowspan) into columns or rows that > > contain no cells other than extended cells should be at least a SHOULD > > NOT, maybe a MUST NOT. > > Wouldn't it be sufficient and more desirable to require each row to have at > least one cell that starts on that row and each column to have at least one > cell that starts in that column? (By starts I mean having the top left corner > there.) > > This would allow tables like this: > 112 > 344 > and > 12 > 13 > 43 > (Where numbers denote cells so that 11 means a cell spanning two columns.) What's the difference? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2006 16:59:38 UTC