- From: Alexey Feldgendler <alexey@feldgendler.ru>
- Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 19:27:14 +0600
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 16:18:32 +0600, Anne van Kesteren <fora at annevankesteren.nl> wrote:
>>> I think this hasn't been suggested before. Perhaps the method should
>>> accept a DOMTokenString as argument instead of an array. This allows
>>> things like ele.getElementsByClassName(ele.className) etc. The only
>>> problem is how to get a DOMTokenString without first getting .className
>>> from somewhere. Perhaps it should be a constructor as well. 'x = new
>>> DOMTokenString("aaa bbb")'
>> How is it better than DOMString?
> It inherits from DOMString.
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#domtokenstring defines
> it.
I still don't get it what's the advantage of having getElementsByClassName take a DOMTokenString argument over a plain DOMString.
--
Alexey Feldgendler <alexey at feldgendler.ru>
[ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.com
Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 05:27:14 UTC