On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 19:21:42 +0600, Matthew Paul Thomas <mpt at myrealbox.com> wrote: >> Footnotes and endnotes are identical in content in the context of a >> print document and I am not certain how they'd differ even >> presentationally on a web page, so yes, I think those can be >> considered identical in terms of markup.? > Scholarly books sometimes use both footnotes and endnotes for different > things -- footnotes for citations and endnotes for tangential > discussions, or vice versa. I've never seen an HTML document try to > make this distinction, though. That's because HTML documents can only have endnotes so far. -- Alexey Feldgendler <alexey at feldgendler.ru> [ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.comReceived on Sunday, 5 November 2006 01:36:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:49 UTC