- From: Alfonso Baqueiro <abaqueiro@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 13:53:12 -0600
Here is the document that explains prototype.js and its extensions http://www.sergiopereira.com/articles/prototype.js.html 2006/11/4, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch>: > > > (I couldn't work out what thread this was a continuation to -- the first > message below didn't have a "Re:" in the subject line, and I can't find > any other thread that used the word "hazard". So I don't know exactly > what this thread was about. However, I shall not let that stop me from > jumping in and giving my two cents...) > > On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Douglas Crockford wrote: > > > > This is a convenience issue. Having toJSONString as a builtin is a > > convenience, removing the need to load json.js. > > Assuming the thread is about introducing a way to convert a JS object into > a JSON representation, then I would encourage you to contact the > ECMAScript committee. Adding features to JavaScript is out of scope for > the WHATWG specs. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20061104/efa7b208/attachment.htm>
Received on Saturday, 4 November 2006 11:53:12 UTC