- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 06:52:34 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, James Graham wrote: > > That's a really particular use case which is hardly representative of > the web as a whole. As sad as it is, 99.9% of authors have no use for > maths (otherwise all these problems would have been solved long ago). > Maths is certainly less of a core feature for most authors than vector > graphics and WHATWG aren't trying to re-implement SVG despite the fact > that it too has no obvious IE6 compatibility story, poor CSS integration > and various other problems. > > Nowhere in the WHATWG document does it say that they're going to try and > fix everything. You have to choose your battles and, personally, I agree > with the idea that, if the proponents of CSS-based maths want to work in > the structure of the WHATWG, they should demonstrate the feasibility of > their approach using a microformat. Given the constraints under which > they have chosen to operate it should be possible to do this without any > difficulties. The microformat based approach has several advantages too, > e.g. instant implementation in existing HTML4 UAs (a new markup language > would require changes to the parser). This should allow the language to > evolve as it encounters real-world needs so, if and when it is formally > standardized, it will be a better product than typically results from an > standardization-before-implementation approach. As usual, James has managed to express himself much better than I can. I completely agree with what he writes above. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 17 June 2006 23:52:34 UTC