- From: Stefan Gössner <stefan@goessner.net>
- Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 22:47:44 +0200
>>as well as more elegantly in my opinion >> >>X.a().b().c(); >> >> > >The latter, IMHO, is semantically bogus. But that's just a matter of >opinion, of course. > > hmm ... ctx.scale(2,1) .rotate(Math.PI/4) .translate(4,-6); illustrates a sequence of manipulations semantically very well, doesn't it?
Received on Sunday, 2 July 2006 13:47:44 UTC