- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 15:18:46 +0100
Quoting "Eugene T.S. Wong" <lists.eugenetswong at gmail.com>: > I'd like to recommend that the WHATWG bring back <CENTER> because it > provides an excellent way of saying "this is a centered <DIV>". <DIV> > is no more semantic that <I>, <B>, or <CENTER>, yet they have their > uses. I couldn't find any reference to a <div> element in HTML5 except in some non normative examples... > I believe that they are useful for visual user agents, in that we > don't have to provide a class name for simple uses. Generally > speaking, <CENTER> should be used sparingly, if at all, but it > should be used. <CENTER> could be used for resume headings and > various other types of text, like peotry. What would its semantics be as opposed to <div>? Do you have a concrete proposal as how <center> would work? > I'd like to recommend that the WHATWG bring back <MENU> & <DIR>, <http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-menu> I have not seen <dir> and I'm unsure what it could be used for... > I'd like to recommend that the WHATWG standardize <NL>. I suggest > this because <NL> is shorter than <NAV> and because <NL> is > consistent with XHTML. As I typed the previous sentence, I noticed > that <NL> is much easier to type with 1 hand, than <NAV>. I could not find <NL> (or <nl>) in any XHTML recommendation. I also never encountered it anywhere as actually being used, only in some examples taken from the XHTML 2.0 draft... -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Sunday, 15 January 2006 06:18:46 UTC