- From: Eugene T.S. Wong <lists.eugenetswong@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:00:46 -0800
Hi all. I'm interested in bringing back some of the old elements that still work. I'd like to recommend that the WHATWG bring back <CENTER> because it provides an excellent way of saying "this is a centered <DIV>". <DIV> is no more semantic that <I>, <B>, or <CENTER>, yet they have their uses. I believe that they are useful for visual user agents, in that we don't have to provide a class name for simple uses. Generally speaking, <CENTER> should be used sparingly, if at all, but it should be used. <CENTER> could be used for resume headings and various other types of text, like peotry. I'd like to recommend that the WHATWG bring back <MENU> & <DIR>, because these elements have semantic meaning and don't significantly affect how the list is presented. The lack of significant effects means that the legacy browsers will still be able to make use of the elements. The good thing about creating more semantic list elements, is that they create a greater diversity, standardization and detail, without requiring enhancements to UA technology. You could make any type of a list and it would work. The default styling may not be what you want, but it would work. I'd like to recommend that the WHATWG standardize <NL>. I suggest this because <NL> is shorter than <NAV> and because <NL> is consistent with XHTML. As I typed the previous sentence, I noticed that <NL> is much easier to type with 1 hand, than <NAV>. I'd like to recommend that the WHATWG bring back the <FON...um, never mind. ;^) Thoughts? Questions? Comments? -- Sincerely, and with thanks, Eugene T.S. Wong
Received on Friday, 13 January 2006 13:00:46 UTC