- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 16:26:55 +0000
Sander Tekelenburg wrote: > nor do I see how <cite a=URI> provides a way to have visual metadata > that <q cite=URI> does not already. (Not to mention that <q cite=URI> > allows authors to provide markup that can be understood by older UAs.) I assumed Anne meant something like: <q>rhubarb rhubarb rhubarb</q> [<cite><a href="www.example.com">Nemo, Works, IV</a></cite>] Which would be backwards compatible, but wouldn't unambiguously connect q and cite. Which is a major disadvantage in my view. > FWIW, I find iCab's implementation quite usable: indicating that metadata is > available by a cursor change when hovering over the data, and allowing to > directly open the cite attribute's URI (in a new window) through the > contextual menu's "Show Reference" command. (I'm not fond of > 'hover-dependancy' like this, but through CSS a more easily recognisable clue > can be added. For instance something like the dotted underline that has > become somewhat common, to indicate title attributes for abbr and acronym.) Thanks for letting us know about this. I don't have a nice shiny Mac and hadn't thought of looking into iCab's implementation. I'm happy to hear it's not dissimilar to my own. If anyone can think of an unambiguous, non-disruptive indicator for cited quotations, I'd happily attempt to add it to my implementation. I'm a bit unsure about underlining, since that's already got quite a lot of meanings and potential conflicts. -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Sunday, 31 December 2006 08:26:55 UTC