- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:24:54 +0100
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:42:24 +0100, Thomas Broyer <t.broyer at gmail.com> wrote: > Additional note: as I read this, if the DOCTYPE was previously marked > as being "in error", it should then be rolled back to being "correct" > if the DOCTYPE name is "HTML": <!DOCTYPEHTML> would *not* be marked > "in error". It would be a parse error, but > That's probably not what's intended. yeah, I suppose not. I don't really see directly how you can nicely deal with that during tokenizing. Hmm. (It would work with a flag, but that's not nice.) > So I'll just code it so that these are "correct": > <!doctype html> > <!DOCTYPE HTML> > and every other lowercase/uppercase variant; > and thiese are "in error": > <!doctypehtml> > <!DOCTYPEHTML> > and every other lowercase/uppercase variant. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 21 December 2006 13:24:54 UTC