- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:20:50 +0100
* Ian Hickson wrote: >> You should request removal of the section. It is just a non-normative >> discussion of implications of the parsing algorithm despite the claim >> that "extra restrictions" are being defined and the misuse of RFC2119 >> keywords. As the thread shows, such discussion is unlikely to be com- >> plete, but likely to mislead and confuse. > >Actually, it's the only place that defines what the syntax is. It's >rather important! The parser section defines how to parse and report >errors, but it doesn't give conformance criteria for documents and >authoring tools. That may be so. I am saying is it is a very bad idea to organize the specification this way. -- Bj?rn H?hrmann ? mailto:bjoern at hoehrmann.de ? http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 ? Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 ? http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim ? PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 ? http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 4 December 2006 05:20:50 UTC