- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:17:46 +0200
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 05:33:26 +0200, mozer <xmlizer at gmail.com> wrote: > A lot of work as already been done by the W3C XSL WG on calendar (and > even negative year in needed) > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#lang-cal-country > On 8/15/06, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: >> On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Michel Fortin wrote: >>>> I'm inclined to think that the best option for WF 2.0 is to require >>>> the use of the proleptic Gregorian calendar all the way to 0001-01-01. >>> >>> What about prior dates? >> >> I don't think we need to support years before 1CE. ... >> Anybody doing real work with dates that far back is going to have very >> specific needs when it comes to calendars and WF2 isn't going to cut it >> for them. I disagree. There are a lot of use cases for simple forms dealing with dates before 0001-01-01 even if we just use the proleptic Gregorian calendar. The most obvious is a conversion widget between calendars - there is no need for machine-interpretable information to know that one date is julian and one gregorian to find the right dates for tracking key events leading to the October Revolution... I think it is a reasonable decision to simply use proleptic Gregorian as the default date type, although I would like to see WF3 have some mechanism to declare a variation from that, because there are use cases where that is necessary for things that will happen in the next few months... If the goal of WF2 is to provide something simple for people to use, then it ought to be a preferable option for people like history teachers with basic web skills, or the support guy or smart kid at school who helps them out. -- Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group hablo espa?ol - je parle fran?ais - jeg l?rer norsk chaals at opera.com Try Opera 9 now! http://opera.com
Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2006 03:17:46 UTC