- From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 05:33:26 +0200
A lot of work as already been done by the W3C XSL WG on calendar (and even negative year in needed) http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#lang-cal-country Cheers On 8/15/06, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Michel Fortin wrote: > > > > > > I'm inclined to think that the best option for WF 2.0 is to require > > > the use of the proleptic Gregorian calendar all the way to 0001-01-01. > > > > What about prior dates? > > I don't think we need to support years before 1CE. (Frankly I don't think > we need support dates before 1800 CE either, but that's another story.) > > Anybody doing real work with dates that far back is going to have very > specific needs when it comes to calendars and WF2 isn't going to cut it > for them. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20060816/edbe0e90/attachment.htm>
Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2006 20:33:26 UTC