W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > April 2006

[whatwg] proposed canvas 2d API additions

From: Vladimir Vukicevic <vladimirv@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:10:11 -0700
Message-ID: <9540d010604211210m3a901d4cq7130ed0c1f6d1e5a@mail.gmail.com>
Hi folks,

I'd like to suggest extending the HTML canvas 2d context with a few
additions.  These are variations on some of the methods added to
Opera's "opera-2dgame" context.  The methods are intended to give
content authors direct pixel access to the canvas, as well as provide
some basic point-in-path testing functionality.

    float [] getPixels (in integer x, in integer y, in integer width,
in integer height);

Returns an array of floats representing the color values in the region
of pixels in the canvas whose upper left corner is at (x,y) and which
extends for width,height pixels.  These coordinates are in canvas
pixel space (that is, the same space that the canvas width and height
attributes are specified in).  The color values for each pixel are
returned as 4 floats, each in the range of 0.0 to 1.0, in R,G,B,A
order.  That is, given the paramters (0,0,2,2), the returned array
will be [R00 G00 B00 A00 R10 G10 B10 A10 R01 G01 B01 A01 R11 B11 G11

Note: we could return the pixels as integers in the range of 0..255,
as 8-bit color is most likely what canvases will be dealing with. 
However, using floats allow us to easily extend into a 16-bit
colorspace without any API changes.  In addition, any computation
using these pixels is often done in normalized colors, so the division
by 255 would need to happen anyway.

    void putPixels (in float [] pixels, in integer x, in integer y, in
integer width, in integer height);

Does the opposite of getPixels; the given array must be exactly width
* height * 4 elements in length.  The values are to be clamped to

    boolean pointInPathFill(in float x, in float y);

pointInPathFill returns true if the given point would be inside the
region filled by the current path, and false otherwise.  The x,y
coordinates are in the current space of the canvas; that is, they are
transformed by the CTM and do not necessarily map directly to pixels.

I'd suggest that these three functions be added directly to the "2d"
context; content authors can test for their presence by checking the
function is not null on the 2d context object.  We might want a more
comprehensive way of letting authors test whether particular features
are supported, e.g. "shadows", "pixel-access", etc, but maybe it's not

How's this sound?

    - Vlad
Received on Friday, 21 April 2006 12:10:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:46 UTC