- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 02:36:33 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > Is there a reason why the switch element accept any block content and > instead of accepting just section elements? If section is the only > element with the suitable DOM interface, wouldn't it make sense for the > content model to be zero or more section elements one of which (if > non-zero sections) must have the active attribute set? <switch> hasn't really been thought through. I welcome suggestions for whether we should keep it and/or how it should work (in particulra considering fallback behaviour). I agree that it makes sense to only allow <section> children. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 15 April 2006 19:36:33 UTC