- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 22:53:14 +0300
On Apr 2, 2006, at 19:26, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > I agree. Note also that the repetition template also allows for > characters that > are compatible with XML ID. Of course, this is only for valid > documents... All > things should still be defined in a way that they take into account > invalid, > yet well-formed, documents as well. (And HTML documents...) I am interested in conforming DTD-invalid well-formed XHTML documents and conforming HTML documents. I think that whatever is allowed as an id attribute value in conforming HTML documents should also be conforming as a value of an id attribute in XHTML (but not necessarily conforming as an xml:id value) in order to allow XHTML- serializability of conforming HTML docs. (I am not interested in DTD-valid documents. I consider DTDs harmful.) -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen at iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Sunday, 2 April 2006 12:53:14 UTC