- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 22:51:05 +0300
On Sep 4, 2005, at 22:23, Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Sep 4, 2005, at 19:46, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> Quoting Henri Sivonen <hsivonen at iki.fi>: >>> What about the interaction of <section> with <head> and <body>? >> >> You said yourself that any element other than a few known ones closes >> the HEAD >> element and implies a BODY element start tag. > > So I did, but I now think my reasoning leading to that conclusion was > flawed. (I should have corrected myself on this mailing list earlier.) > If only a closed list of elements is allowed in HEAD, it will be > impossible to introduce extensions that occur as children of HEAD. An > explicit list of element starts that close HEAD would solve that > problem. > > The implicit boundary of HEAD and BODY is a tricky issue with > open-ended extensions. I guess I'll have to examine browser behavior > as the next step. It appears that my first attempt was compatible with browsers and introducing new child elements of HEAD is already impossible. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen at iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Sunday, 4 September 2005 12:51:05 UTC