- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 20:10:05 +1000
Henri Sivonen wrote: > What about the interaction of <section> with <head> and <body>? > > How would you insert the optional tags in this case: > > <!DOCTYPE html> > <title>...</title> > <section>...</section> > <div>...</div> > > ? > > My tentative assumption has been > <!DOCTYPE html> > <html><head><title>...</title> > </head><body><section>...</section> > <div>...</div></body></html> That is how I would recommend it be defined. It's not what Firefox does (that's the easiest browser to get the DOM source from), but I don't think the defined behaviour should be affected by the results of current browsers, in this case. > <!DOCTYPE html> > <html><head><title>...</title> > <section>...</section> > </head><body><div>...</div></body></html> Firefox doesn't even get that, it does this: (I've replaced "..." with "section" and "div", respectively, and formatted for easier reading) <html> <head> <title>Testing</title> <section></section> </head> <body> section <div> div </div> </body> </html> In fact, even if you explicitly insert the <body> start tag, you get some strange results from unknown elements like section. For example, given this document: <!DOCTYPE html> <title>Testing</title> <body> <section>section <em>emphasis</em> <article>article</article> <div>div</div> </section> Firefox closes the section element before any known block element, but allows any text nodes, inline elements, and other unknown elements to be nested. <html> <head> <title>Testing</title> </head> <body> <section> section <em>emphasis</em> <article>article</article> </section> <div> div </div> </body> </html> This is why it should be defined that elements like <setion> should imply <body>; however, for backwards compatibility, it should be recommended that the start tags not be omitted in such cases. Even then, it won't always work as intended. eg. you can't use these: section div, section p, ... { /* ... */ } -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/
Received on Monday, 5 September 2005 03:10:05 UTC