- From: ROBO Design <robodesign@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:35:11 +0300
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:08:58 +0300, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt at lachy.id.au> wrote: > ROBO Design wrote: <...> > > There's no reason to use XHTML 1.0 over HTML 4.01; in fact there are > many reasons not to. For starters, IE doesn't support XHTML and it > would be rather ironic to write a spec designed for backwards > compatibility in IE, using a language it doesn't even support. > > See this, and search google, for more information about XHTML vs HTML. > http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml I have experience and I believe I know the differences between XHTML 1.0 and HTML 4. Yet, I don't believe I know *all* of them. In fact, I learned some things from that article. Thanks. <...> > > http://ian.hixie.ch/bible/english Ummm... it still doesn't answer my question: why? -- http://www.robodesign.ro ROBO Design - We bring you the future
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2005 08:35:11 UTC