- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:08:58 +1000
ROBO Design wrote: > I took a closer look into the source code of both of the specifications. > Interestingly, you don't use XHTML 1.0 strict, you stick to valid HTML > 4.01 Strict (no </html> !). There's no reason to use XHTML 1.0 over HTML 4.01; in fact there are many reasons not to. For starters, IE doesn't support XHTML and it would be rather ironic to write a spec designed for backwards compatibility in IE, using a language it doesn't even support. See this, and search google, for more information about XHTML vs HTML. http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml > Last, but not least, please let us know about the advantages of using > lang="en-GB-hixie". I'm really curious about the reason for doing so. http://ian.hixie.ch/bible/english -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2005 05:08:58 UTC