W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2005

[whatwg] <a href="" ping="">

From: Charles Iliya Krempeaux <supercanadian@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:39:43 -0700
Message-ID: <84ce626f0510251439p5f80b0b2j8f4673731dd0d212@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/22/05, James Graham <jg307 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:


> So why not enforce this case by making the client do a redirect as soon
> as it receives a response from the original URL:
> <a href="tracker.cgi" redirect="destination.html">
> On receiving a response from tracker.cgi the client would redirect to
> destination.html, irrespective of the contents of the response. It would
> allow the correct destination to be displayed in the status bar which,
> as far as I can tell, is the only merit of the original 'ping' proposal,
> but still has the disadvantage that no-one would use it (since a UA
> could easily disable contacting tracker.cgi,  making it useless for
> advertisers). It does, however,  have a reasonable backward
> compatibility story (tracker.cgi would typically take a URL parameter
> which it would redirect to). The big problem is that it seems horrible
> to implement, as one has to have special handling at the network level
> for requests initiated from a link with a redirect attribute.

One disadvantage of this is that you do not have multiple pings. 
(Which is often needed for advertising situations.)

See ya

     Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.

     charles @ reptile.ca
     supercanadian @ gmail.com

     developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
 Never forget where you came from
Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2005 14:39:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:43 UTC