- From: ROBO Design <robodesign@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 13:02:56 +0300
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 06:36:30 +0300, dolphinling <dolphinling at myrealbox.com> wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: <...> > > This still doesn't "force" it to work. As a user-tracking-implementer > doing it for money, I want to make absolutely sure I count properly. > That means forcing people to hit the counter _before_ even telling them > where they're going, so they can't get around it. There's no way to do > this with ping=. > <...> > > The audience of people who would use tracking is huge. The audience of > people who would use ping= is, for the reasons I said before, much much > smaller. > > Like I said before, I like the semantics of ping=. But it doesn't fit > into the usage model that advertisers and other trackers want. > Semantically, I want notification and linking to be separate. In usage, > they want them to be linked. They seem to me to be mutually exclusive. You have a point. Yet, you shouldn't forget that most of the tracking done today by advertisers is with JavaScript, with Flash :(, with iframes, and in general with ugly stuff that can be disabled. You'll see the point I'll be making in another reply. -- http://www.robodesign.ro ROBO Design - We bring you the future
Received on Saturday, 22 October 2005 03:02:56 UTC