- From: S. Mike Dierken <mike@dierken.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:26:55 -0700
> > Bearing the above in mind, I've added a section to the <a> > element that describes a ping="" attribute. The URIs given in > this attribute would be followed when the user clicks the > link, thus getting around the problems listed above. The term 'ping' in terms of RSS/blogs often means to POST some data, but in this case, it would be a GET request - that may get confusing. Perhaps 'also-get' or 'snoop-href' something like that. Ideally, the data within the tags would be able to have more than one anchor and each would have different roles, but I don't think HTML supports that (except for the <link> elements in the <head> section since they apply to the containing document). For example: <a href='...' rel='default'><a href='...' rel='snoop'>this uses nested anchors - which are illegal</a></a> (nested anchors are illegal I know... http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/links.html#h-12.2.2) So the pragmatic alternative is exactly as you suggest - a new attribute. > Thoughts? Is it evil? Yes, but even the anti-christ is just another customer.
Received on Friday, 21 October 2005 20:26:55 UTC