- From: ROBO Design <robodesign@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:21:09 +0300
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 04:46:39 +0300, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt at lachy.id.au> wrote: > ROBO Design wrote: <...> > > If you want it done like that, then at least use type="button". That > way, users of legacy UAs don't get confused by a strange text box that > they don't know what to put into it, but rather end up with a button > that does nothing when clicked. Neither are ideal from a usability > perspective, but the button seems like better graceful degradation. > > However, <button type="add"> already does that, so I'd just leave it as > is. > I know neither are ideal from a usability perspective. Yet, 'ideal' cannot be achieved in this case (or probably ... ideals can't be achieved). It's up to Ian to decide what he believes to be the best. -- http://www.robodesign.ro ROBO Design - We bring you the future
Received on Sunday, 16 October 2005 02:21:09 UTC