- From: Dean Edwards <dean@edwards.name>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:15:10 +0000
I've never known this group to be in such agreement! Jim? ;-) -dean James Graham wrote: > Olav Junker Kj?r wrote: > >> Ian Hickson wrote: >> >>> Ok, would anyone object to us changing it to type="url"? I don't feel >>> strongly about this. >> >> >> >> Consistency with CSS is a very good point. URL is more widely known >> and used than URI, and since both are technically incorrect anyway (if >> the type is actually IRI), go for URL. >> > I agree. URL is the only term that will be understood by the vast > majority of authors. >
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 05:15:10 UTC