[whatwg] [wf2] type="url"

Olav Junker Kj?r wrote:

> Ian Hickson wrote:
>> Ok, would anyone object to us changing it to type="url"? I don't feel 
>> strongly about this.
> Consistency with CSS is a very good point. URL is more widely known 
> and used than URI, and since both are technically incorrect anyway (if 
> the type is actually IRI), go for URL.
I agree. URL is the only term that will be understood by the vast 
majority of authors.

"But if science you say still sounds too deep,
Just do what Beaker does, just shrug and 'Meep!'"

-- Dr. Bunsen Honeydew & Beaker of Muppet Labs

Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:51:02 UTC