- From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:51:02 +0000
Olav Junker Kj?r wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > >> Ok, would anyone object to us changing it to type="url"? I don't feel >> strongly about this. > > > Consistency with CSS is a very good point. URL is more widely known > and used than URI, and since both are technically incorrect anyway (if > the type is actually IRI), go for URL. > I agree. URL is the only term that will be understood by the vast majority of authors. -- "But if science you say still sounds too deep, Just do what Beaker does, just shrug and 'Meep!'" -- Dr. Bunsen Honeydew & Beaker of Muppet Labs
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:51:02 UTC